CCW Old School Review: Avengers Annual #10 (1981)

Posted: December 17, 2009 in CCW Old School Review, CCW Review
Tags: , , ,

[Editor’s Note: Earlier today I mistakenly uploaded a non-corrected version of this review. I wholeheartedly apologize to all of those readers who believe comic book blogging should be taken as serious business and for any trauma I may have caused you. I hope that this somewhat corrected version of the review will be more to your liking. Now, if you don’t mind, I need to go perform seppuku to atone for the shame and dishonor I have brought upon the CCW Blog.]

Title: Avengers Annual #10
Writer: Chris Claremont
Art: Michael Golden
Inker: Armando Gil
Publisher: Marvel
Cost: 75 Cents! (in 1981)

The other day I read Jose’s review of New Avengers Annual #3 and thought I would put in my two cents about a quality Avengers Annual I had read a long, long time ago. It was Avengers Annual #10, published way back in 1981! I basically said it was the best thing since sliced bread and people that had not read it should go out and spend their time and money trying to get it. Well, much to my surprise, I received a message from Jose asking me to do a review of the book. Can Brian Bendis and Marvel learn a little something from this 28 year old Avengers book? I think the answer is a resounding “Yes!”.

Q: So why should we care about this old ass comic?
A: Well, because it was written by Claremont when he was on top of his game and the art by Michael Golden is excellent throughout. It also has the first appearance by Rogue, back when she was evil. Not to mention the X-Men, Spider-Woman, Ms. Marvel, The Brotherhood of Evil Mutants are all in this story as well as some kick-ass battles and surprisingly touching moments at the end with Carol Danvers.

Q: You’re just doing this review to bash Bendis and Marvel right?
A: Yes.

Q: Sigh! OK, what is the story about?
A: It starts with Spider-Woman saving a woman after she is thrown off the Golden Gate Bridge. Her investigation of the woman’s attempted murder leads her to contact the X-Men for help and eventually leads her to the Avengers. Meanwhile, a super villain named Rogue is kicking the shit out of Captain America, Thor and anyone else who gets in her way in a series of calculated attacks. Iron Man gets taken out of action in a sneak attack at his headquarters by Mystique even before he has a chance to help is fellow Avengers. In short order Rogue and Mystique have taken out the Avengers big three. Cap, Thor and Iron Man are out of action and the remaining Avengers are trying to figure out a motive for the attack. Spider-Woman shows up and the Avengers figure out what is about to go down. It a jailbreak baby! The rest of the Avengers (The Vision, Scarlet Witch, Beast, Hawkeye, Wonder Man, Jocasta) show up to rumble with the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants. A very satisfying knock down, drag out fight ensues, and the Avengers manage to pull out a close victory. At the end of the book what should have been a happy reunion between Carol Danvers and the Avengers gets very bitter and intense as Carol lashes out at the Avengers for not seeing she needed help against her supposed lover Marcus. Marcus was the son (maybe) of Immortus (Kang the Conqueror). He used his father’s hi-tech devices to kidnap and rape (no reason to dance around it) Carol Danvers and impregnate her with another version of himself. Carol makes it back to Earth after Marcus dies of old age in his pocket dimension but makes it a point to have nothing to do with the Avengers, who she feels did nothing to help her against Marcus. Carol and the Avengers work things out to a certain point and the book ends on a somewhat happy note.

Q: That sounds pretty cool, but does it have strong female characters?
A: Very much so. The attack on the Avengers are planned and carried out by Rogue and Mystique, the two of them take out Captain America, Thor and Iron Man quickly in a way that doesn’t seem contrived at all. Spider-Woman takes center stage for much of the comic, investigating what happened to Carol Danvers and also kicking ass in the battle on Rykers Island, helping to free Iron Man and turning the tide of battle in favor for the Avengers. Scarlet Witch is also instrumental in the battle, attacking effectively against the Brotherhood while many of the her male counterparts are getting clobbered. Chris Claremont really seems to respect his female characters and allows them to shine in his book. Chris even gives Carol Danvers a scene at the end of the book detailing the events of her time with Marcus that could have easily turned out to be cheap and exploitive in the hands of lesser writer.

Many readers had felt Ms. Marvel had been treated in a very sexist and demeaning way by Marvel, that Carol Danvers has been the victim of sexual assault and Marvel had treated it as a romantic love story. Chris Claremont was one of those people upset by the treatment of Ms. Marvel and made sure people who read this Avengers annual knew that what had happened to Danvers was in fact rape and not a romance in any sense. There is a excellent article written by Carol A. Strickland that details the events between Ms. Marvel and Marcus and her feeling on everything that happened to Carol and the treatment of female superheroes in comics:

http://carolastrickland.com/comics/msmarvel/index.html

Q: OK, but do the characters act in an intelligent manner?
A: Rogue and Mystique have a problem. They want to get their fellow Brotherhood members being held in Rykers Island out, but they know the moment they show up there the Avengers will show up to stop them. The two of them work out a plan they think will allow them to conduct their jailbreak with minimum interference, and it almost works. Spider-Woman has a mystery to solve and you get to see her investigate it and act on the results of her investigation. The Avengers have a big problem, but you get to see them work that problem out and take a decisive course of action. The great thing about this comic is watching the chess game between the Brotherhood and the Avengers play itself out and you are not quite sure all the way up until the end who is going to come out on top.

Q: Fine, we get it, you love the story, but how was the second feature?
A: No second feature.

Q: Reprinted filler material?
A: None, nadda.

Q: Humkay…so what other books will I have to buy to understand what’s happening in this one?
A: None, the story is completely stands on its own. Even the Carol Danvers stuff at the end is explained with enough back story to understand what is happening without having to read back issues of the Avengers.

Q: Sure the book itself is cool, but it is not attached to any event. How can it matter when there is no event evolved?
A: That’s the thing. Back in the day annuals like this were the “events”. They were the comic equivalent of a summer blockbuster movie, a chance for guys like Chris Claremont and Michael Golden to cut loose and really try to wow your socks off.

Q: So you would pay $5.00 for this comic?
A: Well, no.. but I would pay $4.00 for it easily.

Q: Would you pay $5.00 for the comic so Brian Bendis would read it and perhaps learn a few things?
A: Yes, yes I would.

-Ironmuskrat

Advertisements
Comments
  1. MicahSkin says:

    Reprinted in a TPB “The Greatest Avengers Stories Ever Told”

    • alfred monty says:

      If anyone is interested in the trade…

      The Greatest Battles of the Avengers
      ISBN: 0871359812
      (Check your local library!)

      Some of the prices I found are insane (> $35).

  2. Morlock50 says:

    Ah, the good ole days!

  3. phil says:

    1st off I won’t even go into the ridicoulous amount of $’s I spent to get this comic back in my collection!! I will say it was worth every penny! When I look back on some of my older comics, namely by Claremont, one of the few that holds up is the Avengers annual.
    When I check out my X-men essentials I can see clearly that Claremont was one of the shlockiest writers in his day, but that Avengers book he pulled out all the stops and Golden, what can I say, was golden. I kinda had to get use to a lot of small panels, but the amount of detail he got into those small panels…OMG!!!! To this day MG is one of my favorie artists.

    From one Michiganian to another,great review. You did a pretty good job as a blogger version of Chris Wallace yourself, Jose. |:)

    • Ironmuskrat says:

      Michael Golden is amazing. I still have my “The ‘Nam ” series and his artwork was excellent there as well. But you are right Phil, Golden loved his small panels, Not sure I ever saw him do a two page splash. But that guy could fit more art on a postage stamp then most of today’s artists could put on a full page. I am exaggerating of course, but only by a little =)

      IM

  4. Deemar says:

    Awesome Musky, I sometimes forget Claremont was a ace writer.

    Maybe Chris Claremont needs to have a sit down with ol’Bendis about his woman bashing ways

    • Ironmuskrat says:

      Thanks Deemar.. Like a lot of guys who have been around for seemly forever Claremont has had his ups and downs. I can’t forget though it was Claremont and Byrne’s X-Men that made me make the transition from Richie Rich comics to Marvel and DC.

      IM

  5. nioki says:

    I don’t know squat about marvel, but this review is very good. Just one teeny-weeny request – please proof-read/spell-check your text before posting it.

    • Ya, I never do that.

      Actually, it looks like I uploaded the wrong copy. There was a corrected version that should have gone up. You were the first one to mention something so I didn’t notice it till now. Could have done without the smart ass sarcasm though. You make it sound like this is a constant occurrence on this blog when I know for a fact it is not.

      J.

      • nioki says:

        Whoa dude. Take it easy there. I actually visit your blog and youtube channel because I’m a fan. I’m just saying. I’m very sorry if my post came across the way you thought.

    • Ironmuskrat says:

      Trust me, Jose takes the content on this site seriously, I found that out when I started writing this review. He made numerous corrections to my original review and kicked it back to me several times for rewrites. It appears he posted one of my earlier, crappy versions by mistake.

      In the future, I will try to do a better job in the first place, and not make so much work for Jose.

      IM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s